People v. Herdt
This text of 45 A.D.3d 698 (People v. Herdt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), rendered March 27, 2006, convicting him of criminal mischief in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see People v Williams, 36 AD3d 839 [2007]; People v Gutierrez, 35 AD3d 883 [2006]; People v Lopez, 34 AD3d 599 [2006]). The defendant’s claims of coercion and ineffective assistance of counsel involve matter dehors the record, which may not be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v Williams, 36 AD3d at 840; People v Lopez, 34 AD3d 599 [2006]; People v Petteway, 22 AD3d 772 [2005]). To the extent that the defendant’s claims are reviewable on direct appeal, they are not supported by the record. Rivera, J.P., Krausman, Florio, Carni and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 698, 844 N.Y.S.2d 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-herdt-nyappdiv-2007.