People v. Hepburn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hepburn

204 A.D.2d 568, 614 N.Y.S.2d 211

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 204 A.D.2d 568 (People v. Hepburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hepburn, 204 A.D.2d 568, 614 N.Y.S.2d 211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered August 12, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant was properly advised of his Miranda rights and voluntarily confessed. Moreover, to the extent that the [569]*569defendant’s claims are supported by affidavits outside the record, those claims are not reviewable on this appeal (see, People v Drici, 188 AD2d 611, 612). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Baker, J.), rendered August 12, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement authorities.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence supports the hearing court’s determination that the defendant was properly advised of his Miranda rights and voluntarily confessed. Moreover, to the extent that the [569]*569defendant’s claims are supported by affidavits outside the record, those claims are not reviewable on this appeal (see, People v Drici, 188 AD2d 611, 612). Balletta, J. P., Miller, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D.2d 568, 614 N.Y.S.2d 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hepburn-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack