People v. Hensler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hensler

10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 709 (People v. Hensler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hensler, 10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion for leave to reargue granted, and upon reargument motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one [710]*710copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the District Attorney of New York County, and flies 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before August 9, 1960, with notice of argument for the September 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Herbert Nason, Esq. of 305 Broadway, New York, New York is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion for leave to reargue granted, and upon reargument motion for leave to appeal as a poor person granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one [710]*710copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points on the District Attorney of New York County, and flies 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before August 9, 1960, with notice of argument for the September 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Herbert Nason, Esq. of 305 Broadway, New York, New York is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Rabin, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 709, 202 N.Y.S.2d 195, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hensler-nyappdiv-1960.