People v. Hendrickson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Hendrickson

67 P.2d 754, 20 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 876

California Court of Appeal·Decided May 7, 1937·No. Civ. No. 11391; Civ. No. 11392; Civ. No. 11393·Published

Opinion

CRAIL, P. J.

These three cases are similar in the pleadings, except as to names and amounts, and in the judgments rendered, to the case of People v. Tux Winery Co., No. 11351, this day decided (ante, p. 700 [67 Pac. (2d) 752]) by this court. The appeals were taken five weeks later. The parties have now stipulated in writing that these cases may be submitted for decision on the briefs on file in the Tux Winery Company case.

For the reasons stated in the decision in that case, we also affirm the judgments in these eases.

Judgments affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRAIL, P. J.

These three cases are similar in the pleadings, except as to names and amounts, and in the judgments rendered, to the case of People v. Tux Winery Co., No. 11351, this day decided (ante, p. 700 [67 Pac. (2d) 752]) by this court. The appeals were taken five weeks later. The parties have now stipulated in writing that these cases may be submitted for decision on the briefs on file in the Tux Winery Company case.

For the reasons stated in the decision in that case, we also affirm the judgments in these eases.

Judgments affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.

People v. Hendrickson, 67 P.2d 754, 20 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 876 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

67 P.2d 754 (People v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related