People v. Hendrickson

67 P.2d 754, 20 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 876
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 7, 1937
DocketCiv. No. 11391; Civ. No. 11392; Civ. No. 11393
StatusPublished

This text of 67 P.2d 754 (People v. Hendrickson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hendrickson, 67 P.2d 754, 20 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 876 (Cal. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

CRAIL, P. J.

These three cases are similar in the pleadings, except as to names and amounts, and in the judgments rendered, to the case of People v. Tux Winery Co., No. 11351, this day decided (ante, p. 700 [67 Pac. (2d) 752]) by this court. The appeals were taken five weeks later. The parties have now stipulated in writing that these cases may be submitted for decision on the briefs on file in the Tux Winery Company case.

For the reasons stated in the decision in that case, we also affirm the judgments in these eases.

Judgments affirmed.

Wood, J., and McComb, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tux Winery Co.
67 P.2d 752 (California Court of Appeal, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 P.2d 754, 20 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1937 Cal. App. LEXIS 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hendrickson-calctapp-1937.