People v. Henderson
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irene Duffy, J.), rendered March 10, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 6 months imprisonment and AV2 years probation, unanimously affirmed.
While much of the People’s summation would have been better left unsaid, the summation generally remained within the broad bounds of permissible advocacy (People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396, 399). In any event, any errors with respect to the summation were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the overwhelming evidence of guilt (People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). The only issue was justification, but even defendant’s own testimony failed to support that defense.
While defendant’s request to play a tape recording for the benefit of the jury should have been granted, the error was harmless, because the contents and existence of the tape were undisputed and already known to the jury, because the tape related to a marginal issue, and because, as noted, the evidence of guilt was overwhelming.
We find defendant’s remaining contentions to be without merit. Concur—Rubin, J. P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
213 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.