People v. Henderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Henderson

136 A.D.2d 736, 523 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.2d 736 (People v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Henderson, 136 A.D.2d 736, 523 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered December 17, 1985, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

.The defendant’s claim as to the adequacy of the plea allocution has not been preserved for review as a matter of law (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant acknowledged facts sufficient to establish the commission of the crime and that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have also examined those additional points which the defendant has requested counsel to raise and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), rendered December 17, 1985, convicting him of arson in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

.The defendant’s claim as to the adequacy of the plea allocution has not been preserved for review as a matter of law (see, People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant acknowledged facts sufficient to establish the commission of the crime and that the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

We have also examined those additional points which the defendant has requested counsel to raise and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.2d 736, 523 N.Y.S.2d 981, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-henderson-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack