Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hemphill

People v. Hemphill

89 A.D.3d 607, 932 N.Y.2d 905
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 22, 2011
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.D.3d 607 (People v. Hemphill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hemphill, 89 A.D.3d 607, 932 N.Y.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[608]*608The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant defendant a downward departure from his presumptive risk level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). The underlying pattern of criminal conduct, consisting of three separate predatory sexual attacks, was extremely serious. While defendant asserts he is unlikely to repeat such conduct, we find his contentions unpersuasive. Concur — Moskowitz, J.P., Renwick, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 607, 932 N.Y.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hemphill-nyappdiv-2011.