People v. Hemleb

4 A.D.2d 878, 166 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4369
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 14, 1957·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of a City Magistrate, holding a Court of Special Sessions in the City of New York, Borough of Queens, convicting appellant of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, and sentencing him to pay a fine of $100. The fine was paid. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, information dismissed, and fine remitted. There is no proof in the record that appellant operated the motor vehicle while intoxicated, other than his ambiguous admission, made while intoxicated, that he had been driving the ear. In the absence of additional proof as to operation, this conviction may not stand (Code Grim. Pro., § 395; People v. Strauss, 260 App. Div. 880; People v. Cuozzo, 292 N. Y. 85; People v. Shanks, 201 Mise. 511, affd. 279 App. Div. 1082). Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hemleb, 4 A.D.2d 878, 166 N.Y.S.2d 837, 1957 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4369 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1957).

4 A.D.2d 878 (People v. Hemleb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schools
122 A.D.2d 502 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)