People v. Hemion

37 A.D.3d 616, 828 N.Y.S.2d 815
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 11, 2006, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary is unpreserved for appellate review [617]*617since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; People v Velazquez, 21 AD3d 388 [2005]).

The defendant’s valid and unrestricted written waiver of the right to appeal, as part of his plea agreement, precludes appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Ramos, 21 AD3d 1125 [2005], affd 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; cf. People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hemion, 37 A.D.3d 616, 828 N.Y.S.2d 815 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

37 A.D.3d 616 (People v. Hemion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sulaiman
134 A.D.3d 860 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Coleman
45 A.D.3d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)