People v. Hemingway

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Hemingway

193 N.W.2d 213, 36 Mich. App. 187

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9792

StatusPublished

This text of 193 N.W.2d 213 (People v. Hemingway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hemingway, 193 N.W.2d 213, 36 Mich. App. 187 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

[188]*188Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted in Detroit Recorder’s Court by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of marijuana and appeals as of right. The people move to affirm the conviction.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issue raised on appeal is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[188]*188Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted in Detroit Recorder’s Court by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of marijuana and appeals as of right. The people move to affirm the conviction.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issue raised on appeal is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 N.W.2d 213, 36 Mich. App. 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hemingway-michctapp-1971.