People v. Hemingway

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Hemingway

193 N.W.2d 213, 36 Mich. App. 187

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 1971·No. Docket No. 9792·Published

Opinion

[188] Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted in Detroit Recorder’s Court by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of marijuana and appeals as of right. The people move to affirm the conviction.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issue raised on appeal is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[188] Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted in Detroit Recorder’s Court by a judge sitting without a jury of possession of marijuana and appeals as of right. The people move to affirm the conviction.

Upon study of the briefs and records, it is manifest that the issue raised on appeal is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

People v. Hemingway, 193 N.W.2d 213, 36 Mich. App. 187 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

193 N.W.2d 213 (People v. Hemingway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.