People v. Hemans

2019 NY Slip Op 2115
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
DocketInd. No. 2918/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 2115 (People v. Hemans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hemans, 2019 NY Slip Op 2115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Hemans (2019 NY Slip Op 02115)
People v Hemans
2019 NY Slip Op 02115
Decided on March 20, 2019
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 20, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
MARK C. DILLON, J.P.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-08593
(Ind. No. 2918/14)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Milton Hemans, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Samuel Barr of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Jimei L. Hon of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Gene Lopez, J.), rendered March 31, 2016, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's plea of guilty included a waiver of his right to appeal. Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 341-342; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 145-146).

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of the Supreme Court's suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833).

DILLON, J.P., DUFFY, CONNOLLY and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
The People v. Rasaun Sanders
34 N.E.3d 344 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 2115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hemans-nyappdiv-2019.