People v. Heinsohn
This text of 462 N.E.2d 145 (People v. Heinsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The evidence at trial, measured against the unexceptedto instructions to the jury, demonstrated that defendant was generally familiar with the area in which the accident occurred and that he was traveling well above the speed limit in an unregistered vehicle while tailgating a van when he suddenly pulled out to the left, crossed the center line and drove onto the safety island where he struck and killed two pedestrians.
We agree with the Appellate Division that under these facts there was sufficient proof for the jury to find that defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that his actions would cause the death of another. (Penal Law, § 125.15, subd 1; § 15.05, subd 3.)
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
462 N.E.2d 145, 61 N.Y.2d 855, 473 N.Y.S.2d 968, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-heinsohn-ny-1984.