People v. Heinig
21 A.D.3d 1298, 801 N.Y.S.2d 200
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Heinig. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1297 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Herkimer County Court (Patrick L. Kirk, J.), rendered September 30, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Same memorandum as in People v Heinig (21 AD3d 1297 [2005]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Heinig, 21 A.D.3d 1298, 801 N.Y.S.2d 200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).
21 A.D.3d 1298 (People v. Heinig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Heinig
21 A.D.3d 1297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)