People v. Heidgen
2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 981
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s argument that his Alford plea should not have been accepted because the record does not contain strong evidence of his actual guilt is unpreserved for our review as he has moved neither to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment [982]*982of conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545 [2007]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]).
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Heidgen, 2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 981 (N.Y. 2013).
2 N.E.3d 921 (People v. Heidgen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Hafer
2024 NY Slip Op 00341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Mickel
2018 NY Slip Op 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
BROCKWAY, STEVEN P., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
People v. Brockway
148 A.D.3d 1815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Hughes
134 A.D.3d 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Azor
124 A.D.3d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)