People v. Heidgen

2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 981
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2013·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that his Alford plea should not have been accepted because the record does not contain strong evidence of his actual guilt is unpreserved for our review as he has moved neither to withdraw his plea nor to vacate the judgment [982]*982of conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541, 545 [2007]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Heidgen, 2 N.E.3d 921, 22 N.Y.3d 981 (N.Y. 2013).

2 N.E.3d 921 (People v. Heidgen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hafer
2024 NY Slip Op 00341 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Mickel
2018 NY Slip Op 364 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
BROCKWAY, STEVEN P., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
People v. Brockway
148 A.D.3d 1815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Hughes
134 A.D.3d 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Azor
124 A.D.3d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)