People v. Hegel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hegel

257 A.D.2d 431, 682 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 12, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D.2d 431 (People v. Hegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hegel, 257 A.D.2d 431, 682 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme [432]*432Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered April 2, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, and one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 9 to 18 years, 7V2 to 15 years, 71/2 to 15 years and 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea without holding a hearing. The court’s inquiry was adequate to determine that defendant’s favorable plea agreement had been knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Aquino, 237 AD2d 203; People v Guerrone, 208 AD2d 383).

Defendant’s valid appeal waiver forecloses his present challenge to the suppression ruling (People v Kemp, 250 AD2d 240), which, in any event, was proper. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme [432]*432Court, New York County (Ronald Zweibel, J.), rendered April 2, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, two counts of robbery in the second degree, and one count of reckless endangerment in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 9 to 18 years, 7V2 to 15 years, 71/2 to 15 years and 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea without holding a hearing. The court’s inquiry was adequate to determine that defendant’s favorable plea agreement had been knowingly and voluntarily entered (see, People v Aquino, 237 AD2d 203; People v Guerrone, 208 AD2d 383).

Defendant’s valid appeal waiver forecloses his present challenge to the suppression ruling (People v Kemp, 250 AD2d 240), which, in any event, was proper. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Nardelli, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D.2d 431, 682 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hegel-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack