People v. Heeralal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Heeralal

259 A.D.2d 632, 684 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2444

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Heeralal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Heeralal, 259 A.D.2d 632, 684 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2444 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered January 7, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the second [633]*633degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By validly waiving his right to appeal, the defendant has foreclosed appellate review of the issues which he now raises (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Robinson, 242 AJD2d 593; People v Kirby, 216 AD2d 586). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Buchter, J.), rendered January 7, 1997, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, kidnapping in the second [633]*633degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By validly waiving his right to appeal, the defendant has foreclosed appellate review of the issues which he now raises (see, People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Robinson, 242 AJD2d 593; People v Kirby, 216 AD2d 586). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 632, 684 N.Y.S.2d 923, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-heeralal-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack