People v. Hedstrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hedstrom

273 A.D.2d 477, 711 N.Y.S.2d 736, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7338

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 273 A.D.2d 477 (People v. Hedstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hedstrom, 273 A.D.2d 477, 711 N.Y.S.2d 736, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7338 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered November 13, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[478]*478Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Alexander, 176 AD2d 947; People v Harvey, 175 AD2d 138). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Hobot, 84 NY2d 1021).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Joy, J. P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI