Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Hedrington

People v. Hedrington

267 A.D.2d 475, 700 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13277
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 267 A.D.2d 475 (People v. Hedrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hedrington, 267 A.D.2d 475, 700 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13277 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), rendered June 13, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

As correctly conceded by the People, the defendant was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. His trial counsel failed to object to the People’s violation of a stipulation that they not introduce certain physical evidence at trial (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708; People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184; People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Flores
639 N.E.2d 19 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 A.D.2d 475, 700 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hedrington-nyappdiv-1999.