People v. Hederman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hederman

10 A.D.2d 684, 197 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11308

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 684 (People v. Hederman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hederman, 10 A.D.2d 684, 197 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11308 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the information dismissed and the fine ordered remitted. Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction by a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York for violation of subdivision 2 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, in that he served and sold an alcoholic beverage to a person apparently intoxicated. [685]*685Defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $25 or to serve 10 days. The fine was paid. The proof fails to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, the information dismissed and the fine ordered remitted. Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction by a City Magistrate sitting as a Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York for violation of subdivision 2 of section 65 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, in that he served and sold an alcoholic beverage to a person apparently intoxicated. [685]*685Defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $25 or to serve 10 days. The fine was paid. The proof fails to establish the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 684, 197 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hederman-nyappdiv-1960.