People v. Hector

248 A.D.2d 184, 670 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2392
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 10, 1998·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas Galligan, J.), rendered June 20, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant’s offer of proof failed to establish the relevance of the witness’s prospective testimony, the court’s refusal to permit defendant to call the witness was proper (People v Arroyo, 77 NY2d 947, 948). To the extent that the proffered testimony may have corroborated defendant’s own testimony, it did so only as to collateral matters (People v Perez, 236 AD2d 298, Iv denied 89 NY2d 1039). In any event, any error in precluding such testimony was harmless given that the testimony could not have affected the verdict.

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hector, 248 A.D.2d 184, 670 N.Y.S.2d 764, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2392 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 184 (People v. Hector) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Andrew
54 A.D.3d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Brown
304 A.D.2d 321 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)