People v. Hector

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hector

137 A.D.2d 620, 524 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 8, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 137 A.D.2d 620 (People v. Hector) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hector, 137 A.D.2d 620, 524 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered March 19, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have examined the remainder of the defendant’s contentions, including the one raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered March 19, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People, was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have examined the remainder of the defendant’s contentions, including the one raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit or unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Bracken and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 A.D.2d 620, 524 N.Y.S.2d 366, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hector-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack