People v. Heck
This text of 110 P. 525 (People v. Heck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was charged with the crime of passing a fictitious check. Upon the trial he was convicted, and this is his appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The case was upon the calendar for oral argument May 9, 1910, at which time no one appeared for the defendant, but upon the suggestion of the attorney general that it had been *678 agreed between the attorney general and the counsel for the defendant that the defendant might have fifteen days in which to file a brief, such time was given. He did not file any brief within the time allowed, nor has any extension of time been asked or granted. The case was therefore submitted for the decision of this court.
As we have not been apprised, either by an oral argument or by any brief, of the grounds upon which appellant claims that either the judgment or order should be reversed, we do not feel called upon to search the record for error which possibly might justify a reversal of either the judgment or the order.
The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
110 P. 525, 13 Cal. App. 677, 1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-heck-calctapp-1910.