People v. Heatwole
269 N.W.2d 283, 83 Mich. App. 732, 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2365
Opinions
The majority adopts the statement of facts of the dissent. I hold for reversal in the full knowledge that Judge Beasley’s dissent is entirely logical and eminently sound.
However, unlike the dissent, we cannot differentiate the facts of the instant case from People v McGinnis, 402 Mich 343; 262 NW2d 669 (1978). Frankly, I respectfully question the rationale of McGinnis. Nonetheless, I feel bound to observe the command of our state’s highest court.
Reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Heatwole, 269 N.W.2d 283, 83 Mich. App. 732, 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2365 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978).
269 N.W.2d 283 (People v. Heatwole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. McGinnis
262 N.W.2d 669 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Parsons
228 N.W.2d 852 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Dye
96 N.W.2d 788 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1959)
People v. Johnson
248 N.W.2d 633 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)
King v. Daly
138 N.W.2d 548 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1965)
Bauman v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad
171 N.W.2d 468 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)
People v. McCoy
220 N.W.2d 456 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1974)
Lake Oakland Heights Park Ass'n v. Township of Waterford
148 N.W.2d 248 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1967)
Huffman v. First Baptist Church of Flushing
94 N.W.2d 869 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1959)
People v. Benevides
247 N.W.2d 341 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1976)