People v. Head

306 A.D.2d 356, 760 N.Y.S.2d 671
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Cacciabaudo, J.), rendered April 26, 2000, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court committed reversible error by permitting the People to elicit evidence of a prior bad act is without merit. The evidence was properly admitted as evidence of the defendant’s motive and intent in the commission of the charged crime (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233 [1987]; People v Ventimiglia, 52 NY2d 350 [1981]; People v Molineux, 168 NY 264 [1901]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Head, 306 A.D.2d 356, 760 N.Y.S.2d 671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

306 A.D.2d 356 (People v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Head
15 A.D.3d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)