People v. Head

920 N.W.2d 145
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 7, 2018
DocketSC: 157799; COA: 334255
StatusPublished

This text of 920 N.W.2d 145 (People v. Head) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Head, 920 N.W.2d 145 (Mich. 2018).

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to the defendant's right to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR Subchapter 6.500 that may include his claim that *146the prosecution failed to give timely notice that the defendant would be subject to a 25-year mandatory minimum under MCL 769.12(1)(a). See MCL 769.13(1) ; People v. Hornsby , 251 Mich. App. 462, 472, 650 N.W.2d 700 (2002) ; People v. Ellis , 224 Mich. App. 752, 755, 569 N.W.2d 917 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ellis
569 N.W.2d 917 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1997)
People v. Hornsby
650 N.W.2d 700 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 N.W.2d 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-head-mich-2018.