People v. Head

Michigan Supreme Court

People v. Head

920 N.W.2d 145

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 7, 2018·No. SC: 157799; COA: 334255·Published

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to the defendant's right to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR Subchapter 6.500 that may include his claim that *146the prosecution failed to give timely notice that the defendant would be subject to a 25-year mandatory minimum under MCL 769.12(1)(a). See MCL 769.13(1) ; People v. Hornsby , 251 Mich. App. 462, 472, 650 N.W.2d 700 (2002) ; People v. Ellis , 224 Mich. App. 752, 755, 569 N.W.2d 917 (1997).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is without prejudice to the defendant's right to file a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR Subchapter 6.500 that may include his claim that *146the prosecution failed to give timely notice that the defendant would be subject to a 25-year mandatory minimum under MCL 769.12(1)(a). See MCL 769.13(1) ; People v. Hornsby , 251 Mich. App. 462, 472, 650 N.W.2d 700 (2002) ; People v. Ellis , 224 Mich. App. 752, 755, 569 N.W.2d 917 (1997).

People v. Head, 920 N.W.2d 145 (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

920 N.W.2d 145 (People v. Head) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related