People v. Hazlewood

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hazlewood

46 A.D.2d 776, 360 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 46 A.D.2d 776 (People v. Hazlewood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hazlewood, 46 A.D.2d 776, 360 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, New York County, Special Narcotics Part A, imposed November 28,1972, on a Kings County indictment, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a guilty plea. Sentence reversed, on the law, and ease remitted to the Special Narcotics Court for resentencing. The sentencing court did not provide defendant with an opportunity to be heard prior to its pronouncement of sentence (CPL 380.50). At the time of resentence, the court should have before it an updated probation report. We find no merit to the other contentions raised by defendant. Latham, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, New York County, Special Narcotics Part A, imposed November 28,1972, on a Kings County indictment, upon his conviction of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a guilty plea. Sentence reversed, on the law, and ease remitted to the Special Narcotics Court for resentencing. The sentencing court did not provide defendant with an opportunity to be heard prior to its pronouncement of sentence (CPL 380.50). At the time of resentence, the court should have before it an updated probation report. We find no merit to the other contentions raised by defendant. Latham, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 A.D.2d 776, 360 N.Y.S.2d 456, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hazlewood-nyappdiv-1974.