People v. Hazel

109 A.D.2d 849, 487 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47360
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hazel. Read the opinion of the Court — 92 A.D.2d 691

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), rendered April 19, 1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues that could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Titone, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hazel, 109 A.D.2d 849, 487 N.Y.S.2d 540, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

109 A.D.2d 849 (People v. Hazel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)