People v. Hazel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hazel

13 A.D.2d 793, 217 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11099

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 8, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 793 (People v. Hazel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hazel, 13 A.D.2d 793, 217 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11099 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his motion for resentence as a third felony offender, instead of as a fourth felony offender. On June 28, 1951, judgment was rendered by the said court convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a fourth felony offender, to serve a term of 15 years to life. For the purposes of this appeal the order appealed from has been considered as one denying a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction, otherwise known as an application for a writ of error coram nobis (Code Crim. Pro., § 517). Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated August 15, 1960, denying, without a hearing, his motion for resentence as a third felony offender, instead of as a fourth felony offender. On June 28, 1951, judgment was rendered by the said court convicting defendant, on his plea of guilty, of attempted grand larceny in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a fourth felony offender, to serve a term of 15 years to life. For the purposes of this appeal the order appealed from has been considered as one denying a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction, otherwise known as an application for a writ of error coram nobis (Code Crim. Pro., § 517). Order affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 793, 217 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hazel-nyappdiv-1961.