People v. Haynes

92 A.D.3d 695, 937 N.Y.2d 891
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 A.D.3d 695 (People v. Haynes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Haynes, 92 A.D.3d 695, 937 N.Y.2d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, Fenal Law § 70.08, New York’s persistent felony offender statute pursuant to which the defendant was sentenced, is not unconstitutional (see People v Leon, 10 NY3d 122 [2008], cert denied 554 US 926 [2008]; People v Winfield, 63 AD3d 969 [2009]; cf. People v Quinones, 12 NY3d 116 [2009], cert denied 558 US —, 130 S Ct 104 [2009]; People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005], cert denied 546 US 984 [2005]; People v Stevens, 45 AD3d 610 [2007]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Whittle
102 A.D.3d 710 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 A.D.3d 695, 937 N.Y.2d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-haynes-nyappdiv-2012.