People v. Haynes

695 N.E.2d 714, 91 N.Y.2d 966, 672 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1019
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 30, 1998·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant was convicted of two counts of grand larceny, fourth degree. There was evidence adduced at trial that defendant stole complainant’s purse, which was hanging from the back of a chair on which she was seated. While sitting back in the chair, complainant felt the buckle on the purse strap being pulled across her back as defendant grabbed it. This evidence was sufficient to establish the “from the person” element of Penal Law § 155.30 (5).

Defendant’s remaining contention lacks merit.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick and Wesley concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Haynes, 695 N.E.2d 714, 91 N.Y.2d 966, 672 N.Y.S.2d 845, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 1019 (N.Y. 1998).

695 N.E.2d 714 (People v. Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mack
102 A.D.3d 438 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
United States v. Rodriguez
571 F. Supp. 2d 580 (S.D. New York, 2008)
In re Tanasia Elanie E.
49 A.D.3d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Williams
45 A.D.3d 1413 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Nelson
36 A.D.3d 532 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Auguste
283 A.D.2d 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)