People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hayes

116 A.D.2d 589, 498 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 589 (People v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hayes, 116 A.D.2d 589, 498 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered May 27, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered May 27, 1982, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (four counts), attempted robbery in the first degree, criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 A.D.2d 589, 498 N.Y.S.2d 312, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hayes-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack