People v. Hayden

128 A.D.2d 726, 513 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44411
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 16, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 128 A.D.2d 726 (People v. Hayden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hayden, 128 A.D.2d 726, 513 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered September 23, 1985, convicting him of assault in the first degree (two counts) and criminal contempt in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, we find that the People proved beyond a reasonable doubt all of the requisite elements of assault in the first degree. In addition, we agree with the denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss the third count of the indictment, charging criminal contempt in the second degree, for reasons stated in the trial court’s decision (see, People v Hayden, 129 Misc 2d 444), and the proof at the trial also established, beyond a reasonable doubt, the defendant’s guilt of this crime.

The defendant failed to object to testimony which constituted evidence of uncharged crimes (see, People v Rivera, 106 AD2d 590). Therefore, the issue has not been preserved for appellate review.

Similarly, as the defendant failed to object to any of the comments made by the prosecutrix during summation, no error of law was preserved for appellate review (see, People v Oakley, 114 AD2d 473), and, in any event, the remarks now [727]*727complained of on appeal did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J. P., Weinstein, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Misla
60 A.D.3d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
People v. Perez
189 Misc. 2d 516 (New York County Courts, 2001)
People v. Sullivan
221 A.D.2d 387 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Halper
209 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. McDonald
144 A.D.2d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Singleton
140 Misc. 2d 960 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1988)
People v. McGraw
138 Misc. 2d 349 (New York County Courts, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A.D.2d 726, 513 N.Y.S.2d 220, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 44411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hayden-nyappdiv-1987.