People v. Hawthorne

742 N.W.2d 132, 480 Mich. 1000
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hawthorne. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 174
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 2007·No. 133729·Published

Opinion

742 N.W.2d 132 (2007)

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas Ervin HAWTHORNE, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 133729. COA No. 265473.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

December 21, 2007.

*133 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's October 19, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:

I would grant the motion for reconsideration and deny the application for leave to appeal. The Court has already remanded this case to the trial court for a hearing on defendant's speedy-trial motion. At that time, the prosecution failed to explain its failure over a period of nine years to bring defendant to trial. I see no reason for a second remand.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARKMAN, JJ., join the statement of MARILYN J. KELLY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hawthorne, 742 N.W.2d 132, 480 Mich. 1000 (Mich. 2007).

742 N.W.2d 132 (People v. Hawthorne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.