People v. Hawks
This text of 234 A.D.2d 903 (People v. Hawks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The failure of the People to disclose the 911 tapes in a more timely manner was improper. County Court did not abuse its discretion, however, in denying preclusion and in imposing a less severe sanction (see, People v Williams, 227 AD2d 906). We decline to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in [904]*904the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). We have examined the arguments raised in the pro se supplemental brief and conclude that they lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, LaMendola, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Callahan, Doerr and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
234 A.D.2d 903, 652 N.Y.S.2d 575, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hawks-nyappdiv-1996.