People v. Hawes

California Supreme Court

People v. Hawes

41 Cal. 632, 1871 Cal. LEXIS 148

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1871

DocketNo. 2,204

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 41 Cal. 632 (People v. Hawes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hawes, 41 Cal. 632, 1871 Cal. LEXIS 148 (Cal. 1871).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Wallace, J.:

The appeal is from the judgment, and rests upon the judgment roll, being in this case the pleadings, findings, and judgment—no bill of exceptions or statement appearing in the record. A stipulation is found embodied in the transcript, from which it would appear that for the purpose of a trial in the Court below and an appeal to this Court, if one should be thereafter taken, certain isolated facts were agreed upon" (not, however, mating up the case to be determined), and [634]*634also agreeing that certain evidence might be offered on the trial, subject to objection, etc. This stipulation is not, by statute, part of the judgment roll. It is not an exception under section one hundred and eighty-eight, nor a statement on appeal under section three hundred and thirty-eight, and we cannot therefore consider it or the points of the appellant, depending, as they do, wholly upon it.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, as of the 10th day of January, 1871.

Mr. Justice Crockett did not participate in the foregoing decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Wallace, J.:

The appeal is from the judgment, and rests upon the judgment roll, being in this case the pleadings, findings, and judgment—no bill of exceptions or statement appearing in the record. A stipulation is found embodied in the transcript, from which it would appear that for the purpose of a trial in the Court below and an appeal to this Court, if one should be thereafter taken, certain isolated facts were agreed upon" (not, however, mating up the case to be determined), and [634]*634also agreeing that certain evidence might be offered on the trial, subject to objection, etc. This stipulation is not, by statute, part of the judgment roll. It is not an exception under section one hundred and eighty-eight, nor a statement on appeal under section three hundred and thirty-eight, and we cannot therefore consider it or the points of the appellant, depending, as they do, wholly upon it.

The judgment is therefore affirmed, as of the 10th day of January, 1871.

Mr. Justice Crockett did not participate in the foregoing decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Cal. 632, 1871 Cal. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hawes-cal-1871.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack