People v. Hatzis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hatzis

272 A.D.2d 1066

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1066 (People v. Hatzis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hatzis, 272 A.D.2d 1066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

The appeal is from an order of the County Court, Kings County, which denies appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury, finding him guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and imposing sentence of imprisonment. The motion, made several years after appellant served the sentence imposed by the judgment, is based on the ground that the trial was unfair and in violation of his constitutional .rights in that perjured testimony was given as to the voluntary nature of appellant’s confession, and that a witness was permitted to testify to the commission by appellant of a crime additional to that charged in the indictment. Order affirmed. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The appeal is from an order of the County Court, Kings County, which denies appellant’s motion to vacate a judgment, entered on the verdict of a jury, finding him guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree, and imposing sentence of imprisonment. The motion, made several years after appellant served the sentence imposed by the judgment, is based on the ground that the trial was unfair and in violation of his constitutional .rights in that perjured testimony was given as to the voluntary nature of appellant’s confession, and that a witness was permitted to testify to the commission by appellant of a crime additional to that charged in the indictment. Order affirmed. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hatzis-nyappdiv-1947.