People v. Hathorn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hathorn

203 A.D.2d 915, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is supported by sufficient evidence, and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 5th Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: From our review of the record, we conclude that the verdict finding defendant guilty of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree is supported by sufficient evidence, and is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495; People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437).

We have reviewed defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 5th Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

People v. Hathorn, 203 A.D.2d 915, 612 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

203 A.D.2d 915 (People v. Hathorn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related