People v. Hathcock

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Hathcock

199 N.W.2d 649, 38 Mich. App. 262

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 27, 1972

DocketDocket No. 10965

StatusPublished

This text of 199 N.W.2d 649 (People v. Hathcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hathcock, 199 N.W.2d 649, 38 Mich. App. 262 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion.

Defendant asserts that reversible error occurred at trial when his confession was admitted in evidence. Defendant claims the confession was involuntary.

After a separate hearing to determine the voluntariness of the confession, the trial judge found it to be voluntary. Our review of the record of that hearing fails to convince us that this finding is clearly erroneous, People v Walker, 6 Mich App 600 (1967).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion.

Defendant asserts that reversible error occurred at trial when his confession was admitted in evidence. Defendant claims the confession was involuntary.

After a separate hearing to determine the voluntariness of the confession, the trial judge found it to be voluntary. Our review of the record of that hearing fails to convince us that this finding is clearly erroneous, People v Walker, 6 Mich App 600 (1967).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 N.W.2d 649, 38 Mich. App. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hathcock-michctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack