People v. Hatfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hatfield

36 A.D.3d 629, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 36 A.D.3d 629 (People v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hatfield, 36 A.D.3d 629, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered March 29, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. .

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]). Furthermore, the County Court conducted an adequate inquiry into the defendant’s vague and unsubstantiated assertions of coercion, which were belied by the record (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524-525 [1978]; People v Sloane, 13 AD3d 400 [2004]; People v Ellison, 12 AD3d 458 [2004]; People v Abney, 10 AD3d 617 [2004]). Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered March 29, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. .

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently pleaded guilty (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 [1983]). Furthermore, the County Court conducted an adequate inquiry into the defendant’s vague and unsubstantiated assertions of coercion, which were belied by the record (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524-525 [1978]; People v Sloane, 13 AD3d 400 [2004]; People v Ellison, 12 AD3d 458 [2004]; People v Abney, 10 AD3d 617 [2004]). Miller, J.P., Spolzino, Krausman, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.D.3d 629, 825 N.Y.S.2d 920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hatfield-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack