People v. Hastings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hastings

224 A.D.2d 279, 638 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1085

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 279 (People v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hastings, 224 A.D.2d 279, 638 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered November 29, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing [280]*280him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

That defendant was not in possession of drugs or the buy money, or found at the buy site reported by the undercover officer when the backup team arrived there, does not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence, where the undercover officer was able to relocate defendant, minutes after the sale, a half-mile away (see, People v Vega, 219 AD2d 500; People v Perez, 189 AD2d 562, lv denied 81 NY2d 975). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered November 29, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing [280]*280him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

That defendant was not in possession of drugs or the buy money, or found at the buy site reported by the undercover officer when the backup team arrived there, does not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence, where the undercover officer was able to relocate defendant, minutes after the sale, a half-mile away (see, People v Vega, 219 AD2d 500; People v Perez, 189 AD2d 562, lv denied 81 NY2d 975). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 279, 638 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hastings-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack