People v. Hastings

224 A.D.2d 279, 638 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1085
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hastings. Read the opinion of the Court — 192 A.D.2d 476

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J.), rendered November 29, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing [280]*280him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

That defendant was not in possession of drugs or the buy money, or found at the buy site reported by the undercover officer when the backup team arrived there, does not render the verdict against the weight of the evidence, where the undercover officer was able to relocate defendant, minutes after the sale, a half-mile away (see, People v Vega, 219 AD2d 500; People v Perez, 189 AD2d 562, lv denied 81 NY2d 975). Concur — Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hastings, 224 A.D.2d 279, 638 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1085 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

224 A.D.2d 279 (People v. Hastings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Perez
189 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Vega
219 A.D.2d 500 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)