People v. Hassan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hassan

57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11592

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 57 A.D.2d 594 (People v. Hassan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hassan, 57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11592 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 2, 1976, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, possession of burglar’s tools and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and [595]*595imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Defendant’s conduct was sufficient to support a conviction of attempted burglary. With respect to the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon, the question of intent was for the jury and the intent could be inferred from .all of the circumstances. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 2, 1976, convicting him of attempted burglary in the first degree, possession of burglar’s tools and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and [595]*595imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Defendant’s conduct was sufficient to support a conviction of attempted burglary. With respect to the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon, the question of intent was for the jury and the intent could be inferred from .all of the circumstances. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Suozzi and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 594, 393 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hassan-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack