People v. Haskell

174 N.E.2d 328, 9 N.Y.2d 729
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 174 N.E.2d 328 (People v. Haskell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Haskell, 174 N.E.2d 328, 9 N.Y.2d 729 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We find the information sufficient; however, the failure of the court to inform the defendant of his rights under section 58 of the Code of Criminal Procedure requires reversal. The requirements of the section are mandatory and not merely directory, and are not waived by defendant’s plea of guilty.

The judgment should be reversed and the case remitted to the trial court for further proceedings.

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur.

Judgment reversed and matter remitted to the Court of Special Sessions of the Town of Villenova for further proceedings in accordance with the opinion herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 N.E.2d 328, 9 N.Y.2d 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-haskell-ny-1961.