People v. Harvey

90 A.D.3d 1415, 934 N.Y.2d 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rose, J.

In 2003, defendant was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and sentenced to 4x/2 to 9 years in prison. In February 2010, he filed an application for resentencing under the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009 (see L 2009, ch 56, codified at CPL 440.46). County Court denied the application on the ground that defendant was scheduled to be released on parole. This appeal ensued.

The record establishes, and the People agree, that defendant is entitled to a hearing on the merits of his resentencing application. Parole release is not a bar to obtaining resentencing where, as here, defendant was in prison at the time the application to be resentenced was made (see People v Santiago, 17 NY3d 246, 249 [2011]).

Peters, J.P., Kavanagh, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Schenectady County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harvey, 90 A.D.3d 1415, 934 N.Y.2d 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 1415 (People v. Harvey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lankford
35 Misc. 3d 418 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)