People v. Hartman
62 Cal. 562, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 564
Opinion
The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz, 34 Mo. 85.)
Judgment and order reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hartman, 62 Cal. 562, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 564 (Cal. 1881).
62 Cal. 562 (People v. Hartman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Picaroni
281 P.2d 45 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)
People v. Gibson
289 P. 937 (California Court of Appeal, 1930)
People v. Ellis
206 P. 983 (California Supreme Court, 1922)
People v. Carpenter
68 P. 1027 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Williams v. Casebeer
58 P. 380 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
People v. Smith
39 P. 40 (California Supreme Court, 1895)
People v. Cunningham
6 P. 700 (California Supreme Court, 1885)