People v. Hartman

California Supreme Court

People v. Hartman

62 Cal. 562, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 564

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 12, 1881

DocketNo. 10,535

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 62 Cal. 562 (People v. Hartman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hartman, 62 Cal. 562, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 564 (Cal. 1881).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court :

The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz, 34 Mo. 85.)

Judgment and order reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court :

The appellant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny, and on the trial the District Attorney was permitted, against the objection of defendant, to introduce evidence tending to show that the defendant had at another time stolen other property than that described in the indictment. This was error. (Walker v. Commonwealth, 1 Leigh, 574; State v. Daubert, 42 Mo. 242; State v. Goetz, 34 Mo. 85.)

Judgment and order reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 Cal. 562, 1881 Cal. LEXIS 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hartman-cal-1881.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack