People v. Hartford
722 N.W.2d 792, 477 Mich. 904
This text of 722 N.W.2d 792 (People v. Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Hartford, 722 N.W.2d 792, 477 Mich. 904 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Albert Joseph HARTFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion to amend the application is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
722 N.W.2d 792, 477 Mich. 904, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hartford-mich-2006.