People v. Hart

91 A.D.3d 574, 937 N.Y.2d 580

This text of 91 A.D.3d 574 (People v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Hart, 91 A.D.3d 574, 937 N.Y.2d 580 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Defendant, who did not move to withdraw his guilty plea, did not preserve his challenge to his plea allocution, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. The narrow exception to the preservation rule explained in People v Lopez (71 NY2d 662, 665-666 [1988]) does not apply because the allocution did not cast doubt on defendant’s guilt. As an alternative holding, we find that defendant’s plea was knowing, intelligent and volun[575]*575tary (see People v Goldstein, 12 NY3d 295, 300-301 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Goldstein
907 N.E.2d 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 574, 937 N.Y.2d 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hart-nyappdiv-2012.