People v. Hart

427 N.W.2d 557, 170 Mich. App. 111
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided March 4, 1988·No. Docket No. 86747·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

AFTER REMAND

Per Curiam.

In our previous opinion in this case, reported at 161 Mich App 630; 411 NW2d 803 (1987), we remanded the case to the trial [112]*112court, directing it to apply the standard of Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79; 106 S Ct 1712; 90 L Ed 2d 69 (1986), to defendant’s equal protection claim regarding the alleged intentional exclusion of black veniremen by the prosecution.

On remand and following a hearing on the issue, the trial court ruled that defendant failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination as required by Batson, supra. We find sufficient record support for the trial court’s findings and, therefore, find no abuse of discretion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hart, 427 N.W.2d 557, 170 Mich. App. 111 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988).

427 N.W.2d 557 (People v. Hart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harville v. State Plumbing and Heating Inc.
553 N.W.2d 377 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1996)
People v. Turner
540 N.W.2d 728 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1995)
Marshall v. State
593 So. 2d 1161 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)