People v. Harrison

2017 NY Slip Op 6455, 153 A.D.3d 1277, 59 N.Y.S.3d 704
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 13, 2017·No. 2015-01294·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), both imposed January 15, 2015, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]), and thus, does not preclude review of the defendant’s claim that the sentences were excessive (see People v Villanti, 152 AD3d 801 [2017]). Moreover, contrary to the People’s contention, the fact that the defendant received the negotiated sentences does not foreclose him from arguing that the sentences were excessive (see People v Thompson, 60 NY2d 513 [1983]). The sentences, however, were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harrison, 2017 NY Slip Op 6455, 153 A.D.3d 1277, 59 N.Y.S.3d 704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 6455 (People v. Harrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cummings
2018 NY Slip Op 8680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Vinson
2018 NY Slip Op 3712 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)