People v. Harrison

138 A.D.3d 757, 27 N.Y.S.3d 896
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 6, 2016
Docket2013-11397
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.D.3d 757 (People v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harrison, 138 A.D.3d 757, 27 N.Y.S.3d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered November 21, 2013, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his guilty plea was valid. Guilty pleas are valid only if they are “knowing, voluntary and intelligent” (People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382 [2015]; see People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 16-17 [1983]; People v Murrell, 135 AD3d 882 [2016]). Here, the record, examined as a whole, establishes that the defendant was aware of his *758 constitutional rights and that he voluntarily relinquished them (see People v Harris, 61 NY2d at 17; People v Sirico, 135 AD3d 19, 22 [2015]).

Rivera, J.P., Balkin, Cohen and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Harrison
28 N.Y.3d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.3d 757, 27 N.Y.S.3d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrison-nyappdiv-2016.