People v. Harrison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harrison

227 A.D.2d 722, 642 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4959

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 722 (People v. Harrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harrison, 227 A.D.2d 722, 642 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4959 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered February 17, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

After entering a private residence for the purpose of taking a flash light, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of 3 to 6 years in prison. In view of defendant’s criminal history and the nature of the crime at issue, we do not find the sentence imposed by County Court to be harsh or excessive. Accordingly, we find no reason to reduce it.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered February 17, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

After entering a private residence for the purpose of taking a flash light, defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree. He was sentenced as a second felony offender to a term of 3 to 6 years in prison. In view of defendant’s criminal history and the nature of the crime at issue, we do not find the sentence imposed by County Court to be harsh or excessive. Accordingly, we find no reason to reduce it.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

227 A.D.2d 722, 642 N.Y.S.2d 565, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrison-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack